Satyam Dwivedi
Satyam Dwivedi
+91 8146 273646satyam@dclawoffices.comGet a Consultation
NCLT IBC Lawyer India

Insolvency & Bankruptcy (NCLT/IBC)

Resolution plans, insolvency applications, and NCLT/NCLAT proceedings

Overview

DC Law Offices has an established Insolvency and Bankruptcy practice before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Delhi and Mumbai Benches. Satyam Dwivedi has presented Resolution Plans worth over INR 200 crores and represents financial creditors, operational creditors, and corporate debtors in IBC proceedings.

Insolvency and bankruptcy law in India is governed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (IBC), which provides a time-bound framework for resolution of stressed assets and corporate insolvency. Proceedings are adjudicated before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) at the admission and CIRP stage, and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) for appeals. The Supreme Court of India hears final appeals on questions of law. Key provisions include Section 7 (financial creditor applications), Section 9 (operational creditor applications), Section 10 (voluntary insolvency by corporate debtor), and the CIRP regulations issued by IBBI (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India). Clients in IBC proceedings face critical time pressures — the 180-day CIRP timeline (extendable to 330 days), complex committee of creditors dynamics, valuation challenges, and the risk of liquidation if no viable resolution plan is approved. Resolution applicants must navigate eligibility requirements under Section 29A and present commercially viable plans within tight deadlines. Satyam Dwivedi, with experience at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas and L&L Partners and recognition as a BW Top 30 Under 30 lawyer, has presented Resolution Plans worth over INR 200 crores before NCLT Delhi and represents financial creditors, operational creditors, and corporate debtors in IBC proceedings at NCLT Delhi and Mumbai benches.

What We Do

Services in Insolvency & Bankruptcy (NCLT/IBC)

01Insolvency applications by financial and operational creditors (Section 7, 9 IBC)
02Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) representation
03Resolution Plans — drafting, presentation, and approval
04Defence against insolvency applications
05Negotiated settlements and pre-admission resolution
06Assured returns disputes and share pledge invocations
07Insolvency applications before NCLT Mumbai against construction companies
08NCLAT appeals
09Restructuring advisory and out-of-court settlements
Courts & Forums

Where We Appear

NCLT DelhiNCLT MumbaiNCLAT (National Company Law Appellate Tribunal)Delhi High Court (related proceedings)
Track Record

Notable Matters in Insolvency & Bankruptcy (NCLT/IBC)

01

Presented two Resolution Plans worth over INR 200 crores before NCLT Delhi

02

Represented clients in insolvency applications against one of India's largest construction companies before NCLT Mumbai

03

Defended multiple insolvency petitions before NCLT Delhi — issues including assured returns and share pledge invocations

04

Involved in negotiated settlement of an insolvency application

05

Advised on pre-CIRP restructuring to avoid insolvency proceedings

FAQ

Questions on Insolvency & Bankruptcy (NCLT/IBC)

What is the difference between Section 7 and Section 9 IBC applications?

Section 7 allows a financial creditor (bank, NBFC, debenture holder) to file an insolvency application. Section 9 allows an operational creditor (vendor, supplier) to do so. Satyam represents both applicants and respondents in both types of proceedings before NCLT Delhi and Mumbai.

Can a company stop an insolvency application once filed?

Yes — a pre-admission settlement or demonstrated repayment can result in withdrawal. Satyam has successfully negotiated settlements in pending insolvency applications, avoiding CIRP for corporate debtors.

What is the CIRP timeline under IBC and can it be extended?

The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) must be completed within 180 days from the date of admission of the application by NCLT. This can be extended by a further 90 days (total 330 days including litigation time as per the Supreme Court ruling in Essar Steel). If no resolution plan is approved within this period, the corporate debtor proceeds to liquidation. Satyam Dwivedi advises both resolution applicants and corporate debtors on time-sensitive CIRP strategy.

Need expert counsel in Insolvency & Bankruptcy (NCLT/IBC)?